Home of POI and fire twirling handwraps - uploaded by mcpSpuiplein - uploaded by CarobananasCaropoi - uploaded by Carobananas
      

BP oil spill

      
Page 5 of 8 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#916672 - 28/06/10 07:44 PM Re: BP oil spill [Re: Puk]
FireTom Offline
Stargazer

Registered: 20/09/03
@ EoN: it's quite ... not my approach falling for marketing arguments. BUT in case that we will have to continue accepting highly pollutive industries in order to maintain our lifestyles... I choose... guess... another lifestyle. Because IF continuation of this lifestyle means that we loose the very foundation on which we live on, then it's quite pointless to continue cutting the tree we're sitting on. Wouldn't you think?

This is not armchair politics - this is about demanding that industries work clean (which they can, if they want/ have to)... "higher prices"... ? Maybe as much as "lower profit margins"?

@ Woodland Apple: not quite true. These studies (however applicable they are in this case) show that many - if not most - people would do the same... maybe through raising awareness and compassion we'll be able to come to a world full of "Schindler's and his kind (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Germans_who_resisted_Nazism). [/pipedream]

@ Dentrassi: re hug2 smile

Originally Posted By: D
ok, so i work for an ethical firm, in an industry where there are some dodgy practices in other locations on the planet. does that make me the devil?


How could it? Your job turns you evil, if you look the other way or commit crimes against humanity or ecology. If you (ethically) work for a company with unethical values, you may have to reconsider (IMHO), raise awareness within the company and to your superiors - and maybe drop out, if nothing changes.

Originally Posted By: D
you get my drift. Life Cycle Analysis is great for revealing hypocracy.


lol completely - the one and only reason for now that we can communicate is based on fossil fuels. And besides: I'm proud for you! hug well done. Apart from that it's all about adjusting your lifestyle (for which reason I gladly missed out on the Fusion festival last WE - ranting to the organizers that IF they would not give fireperformers any incentive, AT LEAST they should provide them with high grade fuel to reduce environmental impact.

I am sick and tired of companies (or venues) who are "willing to sponsor (environmental) projects" (and use them as a marketing byproduct) to clean their slates. Which is why I rather declined offers of people for (ad)sponsors to the InJuCo.

IF ANYTHING - reduce the impact you already have. No need to fix anything, if you don't break it in the first place.

@ Puk: completely! They should have worked out a plan LONG TIME AGO... and not just work out a plan but have it TESTED!

I hope they take them apart and changed my stance: BOYCOT BP! Teach the shareholders and CEO's a lesson they won't forget. (Allegedly JP Morgan owns almost 30% of BP - which is misleading, because JP Morgan is only owning it on behalf of "ordinary" people)....

We *cough* or those holding funds *cough* need to get more aware of what we spend our bucks on - and who works with this money.
_________________________
the best smiles are the ones you lead to wink

Top
#916679 - 28/06/10 09:58 PM Re: BP oil spill [Re: FireTom]
WoodlandApple Offline
addict

Registered: 01/12/09
Loc: Australia
Originally Posted By: FireTom

@ Woodland Apple: not quite true. These studies (however applicable they are in this case) show that many - if not most - people would do the same... maybe through raising awareness and compassion we'll be able to come to a world full of "Schindler's and his kind (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Germans_who_resisted_Nazism). [/pipedream]


or we can look at things like the Stanford prison experiment wiki linki to get a much better understanding of how people really act.

perhaps read Ross and Nisbetts 'The person and the situation' or
'Does high self-esteem cause better
performance, interpersonal success, happiness,
or healthier lifestyles?'
by Roy F. Baumeister
to see how successful manipulative changing of character can be, like you are suggesting.

Maybe now take a look at the article "boot camp deaths" by Gregory D. Kutz, to see the repercussions of these actions.

Im not being too argumentative on this one, my point is making a broad statement like "raise awareness and compassion" or "personal development" not only simply does not work, but can cause harm.
_________________________
sticks and stones my break my bones, but ski patrol will save me.

Top
#916692 - 29/06/10 06:04 AM Re: BP oil spill [Re: FireTom]
EpitomeOfNovice Offline
Putting the "FUN" in fundamental since 1981

Registered: 15/09/09
Loc: Dover, Delaware USA
Originally Posted By: FireTom
@ EoN: it's quite ... not my approach falling for marketing arguments. BUT in case that we will have to continue accepting highly pollutive industries in order to maintain our lifestyles... I choose... guess... another lifestyle. Because IF continuation of this lifestyle means that we loose the very foundation on which we live on, then it's quite pointless to continue cutting the tree we're sitting on. Wouldn't you think?


I don't buy into marketing ploys, but it's beneficial to look at the reality of the big picture. A few hundred thousand consumers boycotting or changing their ways can't make a dent when there are millions and millions of people who still provide companies with plenty of business knowingly or otherwise. If you have the ability to use a computer with internet access think about the long chain of events where if you did boycott intentionally you probably are still funding a huge mega corporations with ties to others. It's not just about fuel, but about manufacturing, utilities, transportation, maintenance and up keep where so many support business they don't even know about.

I can't really believe your lifestyle and levels of consumption are much different than my own if you have electricity, running water, mass manufactured goods or handmade goods made with mass manufactured equipment, if you buy groceries, if you travel...

The only people I would even listen to that argument from I have a low chance of ever meeting because they live in a tribal culture that hasn't been tainted by invasions, outreach efforts, or government barter programs. No matter how much we try, intentionally or not, we are at a state of human development where everyone plays a part in huge things without their knowledge. If the people had the power to over take the minority which are the wealthy business people and such don't you think we'd have incentive to utilize the power for our own benefit to put them in their place and even the playing field? Like without an accident or some horrid event to motivate us to take control of ourselves and who is truly controlling us?

If your answer is "Yes" why hasn't it worked and if your answer is "No" think about why...

As admirable as the intention of making change is, the reality of such change actually coming about and the realistic numbers and amount of deregulation required to make it at all probable I know is not going to happen in modern culture.

I hate capitalism, globalization, and regulation because it has stripped away the importance to the individual and has also made more hopeless struggles and catch 22s of the human condition that are all unnecessary and based on an "individual's" bright idea to come together and make a "productive society". Too bad so many way back when were easily conned, and now in modern times it's taught in such gentle polite terms very few realize they're doing wrong.

Funny huh?

Quote:
This is not armchair politics - this is about demanding that industries work clean (which they can, if they want/ have to)... "higher prices"... ? Maybe as much as "lower profit margins"?


If I had to count the fear factor downfalls of this approach I wouldn't come up with what half of those who put regulations into place would come up with. Regardless accidents will always happen and will never be appropriately planned for when entering into uncharted territory.

BTW I didn't make the armchair politics statement, just for the record.

Quote:
We *cough* or those holding funds *cough* need to get more aware of what we spend our bucks on - and who works with this money.


This level of awareness would probably do more to piss people off and make them feel hopeless/care less and give up more so than it would produce positive change. It's all one big vicious cycle but so is life! Need oxygen to live, but it's a corrosive so therefore we die. wink

I'm not trying to argue, but really there's a balance to everything and even with the best of intentions terrible things happen... like wars... I'm not for a moment going to give any lifeform more credit or value than my own be it a human, animal, plant, planet, or molecule of air, it shouldn't be too hard to understand why even if it's just that the thing I hate wasting most is my own effort!

------------------------------------------------------

On to new updates this disaster has caused one suicide in the gulf by a fisherman scared about his future financial impact (it's sad, but I'm not going to judge and understand why he made that choice) and on top of that hurricanes from developing storm systems have become a reality which will put a halt to containment efforts along with spread the mess.

I didn't see anyone who has updated these two things being shown on the news so I thought I'd add it.
_________________________
~Rock on!~

"As the pattern gets more intricate and subtle, being swept along is no longer enough"-Waking Life

(All you RLers this is epitome_of_lame *waves hello*)

Top
#916693 - 29/06/10 06:05 AM Re: BP oil spill [Re: WoodlandApple]
FireTom Offline
Stargazer

Registered: 20/09/03
(my previous post was written @ 6am... rolleyes )

WA... so you say we're doomed as mankind is cursed by the innate evil... umm wink

Thanks for the links - I'll not go into all of them in detail. But I guess I get what you're trying to put across...

Stanford Prison Experiment (as well as the Third Wave for that matter) are example of how to bring out the worst in man. You feel that it's the same as working for a petrochemical/ nuclear/ mining/ biogenetic or any other industry with highest potential of impact on man and nature? I'd partly agree.

I'd like to point out that the other side of the medal exists as well and that extreme situations also appeal to the lighter side of people. It depends.

Why now - if this thesis are universally human - people volunteer to clean up. Why did people go to Haiti and tried to help there? Why do people donate money to organizations - hoping to make a positive difference?

I'm far from falling for the marketing of 'evil'..

[edit] on second thought



you may be right... :madrant:


Edited by FireTom (29/06/10 06:42 AM)
_________________________
the best smiles are the ones you lead to wink

Top
#916696 - 29/06/10 06:15 AM Re: BP oil spill [Re: FireTom]
EpitomeOfNovice Offline
Putting the "FUN" in fundamental since 1981

Registered: 15/09/09
Loc: Dover, Delaware USA
Originally Posted By: FireTom
Why now - if this thesis are universally human - people volunteer to clean up. Why did people go to Haiti and tried to help there? Why do people donate money to organizations - hoping to make a positive difference


To look good, to impress others, for their reputations, to gain power, to gain admiration, to play a part in controlling others, to make others indebted to them, for opportunities based on character to be offered, to push their products and innovations, free publicity...

Do I need to continue?
_________________________
~Rock on!~

"As the pattern gets more intricate and subtle, being swept along is no longer enough"-Waking Life

(All you RLers this is epitome_of_lame *waves hello*)

Top
#916702 - 29/06/10 06:47 AM Re: BP oil spill [Re: EpitomeOfNovice]
FireTom Offline
Stargazer

Registered: 20/09/03
Originally Posted By: EpitomeOfNovice
Originally Posted By: FireTom
Why now - if this thesis are universally human - people volunteer to clean up. Why did people go to Haiti and tried to help there? Why do people donate money to organizations - hoping to make a positive difference


To look good, to impress others, for their reputations, to gain power, to gain admiration, to play a part in controlling others, to make others indebted to them, for opportunities based on character to be offered, to push their products and innovations, free publicity...

Do I need to continue?


[le sigh]
_________________________
the best smiles are the ones you lead to wink

Top
#916707 - 29/06/10 08:09 AM Re: BP oil spill [Re: FireTom]
EpitomeOfNovice Offline
Putting the "FUN" in fundamental since 1981

Registered: 15/09/09
Loc: Dover, Delaware USA
That's a joke right? lol2

Even a 10 year old could point that shortlist out, like people were born yesterday. All the showboating and ad space taken up by missionaries and humanitarian/special interest groups asking for money and we're supposed to think their intentions are pure?

Think again! lol3

You really want me to believe people do these things strictly for the good of others with no other perks or rewards? Wow, I don't care whether someone thinks it'll get them into heaven quicker, will look good on a resume, or are trying to purify their own misdoings (I'll leave cult like behavior, control, networking, and financial gain out of this one) it's still for selfish motives they are all different flavors of the same evil. rolleyes

Good one! Yeah, denial is totally not my scene buddy so I'm going to leave this thread be in the name of saving on my electric bill to be nice to my wallet which benefits me a great deal (mainly my grumbly tummy)... Along with lessening my impact on resources during a heat wave! lol


Edited by EpitomeOfNovice (29/06/10 08:11 AM)
Edit Reason: typos
_________________________
~Rock on!~

"As the pattern gets more intricate and subtle, being swept along is no longer enough"-Waking Life

(All you RLers this is epitome_of_lame *waves hello*)

Top
#916708 - 29/06/10 08:26 AM Re: BP oil spill [Re: EpitomeOfNovice]
FireTom Offline
Stargazer

Registered: 20/09/03
Originally Posted By: EpitomeOfNovice
Originally Posted By: Frost_Dreamer
Like I said before in my last post, my friends and I are having parties/events where people buy tickets and all of the proceeds go to two organizations that we've found who are helping with clean up and rescuing the animals caught in the oil spill. Join Pirates For The Gulf on Facebook. That's one of the events we're having. We're trying to find spinners to perform at the event right now. Even though this disaster is horrible, we can try to do something positive. Complaining never got anyone anywhere. Parties are an awesome and fun way to get people involved and to help out.


A friend of mine is doing something similar, but for a different cause with animal rescue and she has had a very positive response. I'm in your area, send me a PM or add me to the facepage with the details and I'll see what I can do. I'm supporting my other friend's event in VA, but it's not until September. I look up the group/event page today. smile


umm
_________________________
the best smiles are the ones you lead to wink

Top
#916711 - 29/06/10 08:35 AM Re: BP oil spill [Re: FireTom]
EpitomeOfNovice Offline
Putting the "FUN" in fundamental since 1981

Registered: 15/09/09
Loc: Dover, Delaware USA
Originally Posted By: FireTom
Originally Posted By: EpitomeOfNovice
Originally Posted By: Frost_Dreamer
Like I said before in my last post, my friends and I are having parties/events where people buy tickets and all of the proceeds go to two organizations that we've found who are helping with clean up and rescuing the animals caught in the oil spill. Join Pirates For The Gulf on Facebook. That's one of the events we're having. We're trying to find spinners to perform at the event right now. Even though this disaster is horrible, we can try to do something positive. Complaining never got anyone anywhere. Parties are an awesome and fun way to get people involved and to help out.


A friend of mine is doing something similar, but for a different cause with animal rescue and she has had a very positive response. I'm in your area, send me a PM or add me to the facepage with the details and I'll see what I can do. I'm supporting my other friend's event in VA, but it's not until September. I look up the group/event page today. smile


umm


Everyone wins, including me by having a fun social gathering with entertainment to go to while doing something that makes a friend happy and I take the word of others that proceeds help creatures by funding those to come to their aid...

How is that confusing? Pretty straightforward if you ask me...*so baffled*

Well, at least I don't front shrug


Edited by EpitomeOfNovice (29/06/10 08:46 AM)
Edit Reason: just to set the record straight
_________________________
~Rock on!~

"As the pattern gets more intricate and subtle, being swept along is no longer enough"-Waking Life

(All you RLers this is epitome_of_lame *waves hello*)

Top
#916729 - 29/06/10 01:37 PM Re: BP oil spill [Re: FireTom]
WoodlandApple Offline
addict

Registered: 01/12/09
Loc: Australia
Originally Posted By: FireTom

WA... so you say we're doomed as mankind is cursed by the innate evil... umm wink


No not really, just saying that problems wont get fixed by trying to change peoples personalities, as we are creatures of habit that are highly influenced by the environments we are in. There is no point trying to take a high moral stand when in all probability we would do the same in the same situation.

In not preaching any sort of solution (I agree there is a problem), just saying that the solution is not going to be found by focusing on character change in people, as this does more damage than good.


Quote:
Stanford Prison Experiment (as well as the Third Wave for that matter) are example of how to bring out the worst in man


The standfrord prison experiment was actually designed to prove that Americans were different than the Germans and the Russians. That the atrocities committed were as a result of an unaware and I guess you could say 'evil' culture. That a persons upbringing and moral compass can be different when coming from a more compassionate or enlightened environment and culture.

The experiment was intended to demonstrate mans capacity for good in bad situations. yet what it does show is that it is not the case, a good person put in a bad situation can do (and has been proven to do) bad things.

The boot camp deaths article I mentioned is about the avoidable and totally unnecessary deaths of people in rehab and troubled youth programs. deaths caused by good people trying to do good things using the misguided belief that problems in society can be solved by changing peoples character.

Im not suggesting humans only have a propensity for evil, you are absolutely correct that there are good people out there doing amazing things. I am just trying to show that by making character change a focus in solutions does not work, and by focusing on it actually causes more harm than good. and that is all Im trying to say.
_________________________
sticks and stones my break my bones, but ski patrol will save me.

Top
#916730 - 29/06/10 02:06 PM Re: BP oil spill [Re: WoodlandApple]
WoodlandApple Offline
addict

Registered: 01/12/09
Loc: Australia
Epitome,

reading your posts you are right and yet so absolutely wrong at the same time.


Quote:
You really want me to believe people do these things strictly for the good of others with no other perks or rewards?
hard to believe isnt it? but it does help if you actually try to do good for goods sake yourself...then it gets easier to understand
Quote:
Wow, I don't care whether someone thinks it'll get them into heaven quicker
just butting in to point out that as a christian, good deeds DOES NOT get you into heaven. In fact, if that is your intent then that is the way to MISS OUT in going to heaven
Quote:
will look good on a resume, or are trying to purify their own misdoings (I'll leave cult like behavior, control, networking, and financial gain out of this one)
Im so glad then, that you did leave them out then umm
Quote:
it's still for selfish motives they are all different flavors of the same evil.


my my, such a pessimistic soul. So quick to judge peoples motives and quicker still to speak on behalf of all the peoples of the world
_________________________
sticks and stones my break my bones, but ski patrol will save me.

Top
#916731 - 29/06/10 02:23 PM Re: BP oil spill [Re: WoodlandApple]
EpitomeOfNovice Offline
Putting the "FUN" in fundamental since 1981

Registered: 15/09/09
Loc: Dover, Delaware USA
Originally Posted By: WoodlandApple
Epitome,

reading your posts you are right and yet so absolutely wrong at the same time.


That was just satire hon, you read into it in a way I never intended. It was sprinkled with little bits and pieces of the darker side of "good doing" meant to be read like a stage piece displaying the paradoxical nature of interpretation of good and evil.

I never meant it to be read as the only way, but the way that many people do think and is commonly spoken of. I was just displaying the opposite of what FT stated because people do good things very often for selfish motives, of course I believe there are good people who do things out of the kindness of their hearts...

however when some know publicity or credentials are at stake or simply bragging rights/"keeping up with the Jones'" I'm not naive and don't immediately judge in favor or pureness/selflessness.

None the less, don't people who simply like to give have a natural payoff by enjoying that? They surely aren't all masochistic even though that would be a payoff to masochists right? I know I'm not a pessimist, but I am a realist who is pretty sure all ends of the spectrum benefit some how. I do good because I believe in karma and don't wish to over complicate my life with the repercussions of bad, but I do admit that I benefit from that mentality in many ways not making it absolutely "good" in the purest sense of the word and am comfortable with that.

How is that wrong and anything more than being honest (technically a "good" trait) about an observation of self-awareness along with observations of what people say and their unspoken actions?


Edited by EpitomeOfNovice (29/06/10 02:24 PM)
Edit Reason: typo
_________________________
~Rock on!~

"As the pattern gets more intricate and subtle, being swept along is no longer enough"-Waking Life

(All you RLers this is epitome_of_lame *waves hello*)

Top
#916970 - 29/06/10 10:51 PM Re: BP oil spill [Re: EpitomeOfNovice]
Eera Offline
old hand

Registered: 29/05/03
Loc: In a test pit, Mackay
Just out of curiosity, how far down the foodchain does this "you work in Extractive Industries, you are EVIL" thing go?

The directors and senior executives are evil, OK, what about the owners of the companies, do the shareholders count (1/4 of all Australians). The people directly driving haul trucks, draglines, longwall drillers, OK, they've sold out and are happily destroying the environment for $120,000 a year, what about the employees of CAT, Detroit, Terex, Bucyrus, Euclid, Hitachi and other heavy machinery employees, what about the people in Bridgestone making the tyres?

The cleaners of MAC camps and ESS, they're solely there to service mining, and the cooks on site, the people supplying food too?

Where's the line drawn?

Personally I find it vaguely insulting. I'm in mining because I enjoy the work; I get paid the same whether I'm doing the footings for hospitals, ferry terminals or coal handling and preparation plants so really haven't "sold out" for the money. I could rant on about it, or I can do this instead; shrug my shoulders and let the person who lives in a cave, dressed in skins and hunting their own foot with a flint spear throw the first stone (or spear). ONLY if you do not consume any of the products which we produce can you condemn us for providing the raw materials in the first place.
_________________________
There is a slight possibility that I am not actually right all of the time.

Top
#916975 - 30/06/10 01:10 AM Re: BP oil spill [Re: Eera]
WoodlandApple Offline
addict

Registered: 01/12/09
Loc: Australia
yes, but why is firetom hunting his own foot? Is he like a puppy?

I must be evil too because I have driven 2000kms this week.
_________________________
sticks and stones my break my bones, but ski patrol will save me.

Top
#916991 - 30/06/10 09:24 AM Re: BP oil spill [Re: WoodlandApple]
Eera Offline
old hand

Registered: 29/05/03
Loc: In a test pit, Mackay
LOL

Takes the power out of my "takes the high ground" speach doesn't it.

Damn inability to proof read.
_________________________
There is a slight possibility that I am not actually right all of the time.

Top
#916997 - 30/06/10 12:34 PM Re: BP oil spill [Re: Eera]
EpitomeOfNovice Offline
Putting the "FUN" in fundamental since 1981

Registered: 15/09/09
Loc: Dover, Delaware USA
Originally Posted By: Eera
Just out of curiosity, how far down the foodchain does this "you work in Extractive Industries, you are EVIL" thing go?


If it's anything like his view on the military......

Da-doh-dee-doh-dee-doh *whistles*

wink

Sorry, just want to see if my lightheartedness/goofy self can at all be understood when I don't talk story in person with body language and tone of voice to help with context. grin
_________________________
~Rock on!~

"As the pattern gets more intricate and subtle, being swept along is no longer enough"-Waking Life

(All you RLers this is epitome_of_lame *waves hello*)

Top
#917007 - 30/06/10 06:25 PM Re: BP oil spill [Re: EpitomeOfNovice]
FireTom Offline
Stargazer

Registered: 20/09/03
@ WA: I think I got your point. But it's far too pessimistic for me. Man to be "evil by nature" and "in need of serious therapy" imho is a myth. There are certain mechanisms we all share - for sure - and a lot has to do with ego.

It's not as much trying to change anyone... it's more about changing my own approach and not compromising.

As previously stated: if one admits to be a f***up and stand to it, s/he earns a lot more of my respect (whatever that's worth to anyone) than pretending and singing lalala or playing devils advocate for the sake of it and change your stance for sociable reasons.

I'm not sure though whether America is home to "a more compassionate or enlightened environment and culture" and - to me - the Stanford and 3rd wave experiments are part of its proof. For one we should not forget that most American people have been/ are siblings of Europe... and that torture of prisoners or exploitation of power is to be observed throughout the cultures.

Many "bad" deeds have been committed with best intent - and vice versa, I completely agree with you on that one.

@ Eera: please note that this is my personal approach only and that I can accept anyone to hold a different p o view. I'm not demanding anybody to subscribe to my philosophy. I'm not trying to change anyone... I'm merely manifesting my thoughts and observations.

Yes - it goes down right to the shareholders (especially).

Yes - it goes down to the tipper truckies.

Yes - it goes down right to the consumers.

It's not that anyone of them is deemed "evil" - it's more along the lines of "staying ignorant because it is more comfortable".

If you work for a system and company and keep ignorant to its effects on nature, you're part of the problem. The more you directly profit from it, the stronger your morale needs to be.

If - to keep the analogy - a guard in a concentration camp tortures and kills people.. could he resort to the inhumane system he works for? Do you really believe that a guard would have got shot for not torturing people?

"What is the profit of man, who conquers the whole world and suffers the loss of his own soul?"

You enjoy the work - fine with me. You stand to it - fine with me. You take insult in my ethics... why? Why are you trying to invalidate my approach by pointing out that I am NOT living in a cage. I'm not throwing stones at you. hug

Originally Posted By: Eera
ONLY if you do not consume any of the products which we produce can you condemn us for providing the raw materials in the first place.


How so? (Apart from the fact that no condemnation takes place) The provision of raw materials can - and should - be made safe and as clean as possible.

If a member of the military goes to a foreign country on a mission (as much or little as I may approve of it) - he might claim be doing it IN MY NAME - I can demand him not to torture people, respect civilian lives. If he's not a soldier but a murderer, I can demand him to be removed and face trial as a murderer, without taking any "high morale ground".

Can I not?

You can demand - and you should - nature to be respected, (wo)man to be respected. I can find nothing wrong with it.

Even IF you'd slap your children silly at home, you could still insist on abandoning physical torture at schools. It wouldn't make YOU very consistent but it would still serve a higher purpose.
_________________________
the best smiles are the ones you lead to wink

Top
#917009 - 30/06/10 08:14 PM Re: BP oil spill [Re: FireTom]
Fugee Offline
Cooler than bubblegum!

Registered: 26/02/10
Loc: Dallas, Texas
Ugh! Look at all this fun stuff I missed with all the party nonsense!

Originally Posted By: Dentrassi

yep no disagreement there. Ive never encountered a policy in my firm that goes against my ethics. Its not as if we are like the eco-villians in captain planet you know. but then again, australia has some of the stricted industrial environmental standard (and repercussion for infringments) in the world. If i was working for a nigerian based oil firm on the other hand...


Yet Australia is drunk on coal...hmmm

I'm not sure I can pass my guilt onto someone that works in the Nigerian oil industry because I may possibly be putting some of that oil into my truck.

Originally Posted By: FireTom
I am sick and tired of companies (or venues) who are "willing to sponsor (environmental) projects" (and use them as a marketing byproduct) to clean their slates. Which is why I rather declined offers of people for (ad)sponsors to the InJuCo.

IF ANYTHING - reduce the impact you already have. No need to fix anything, if you don't break it in the first place.


A-censored-men! Aren't we all?

Originally Posted By: EpitomeOfNovice
Originally Posted By: FireTom
@ EoN: it's quite ... not my approach falling for marketing arguments. BUT in case that we will have to continue accepting highly pollutive industries in order to maintain our lifestyles... I choose... guess... another lifestyle. Because IF continuation of this lifestyle means that we loose the very foundation on which we live on, then it's quite pointless to continue cutting the tree we're sitting on. Wouldn't you think?


I don't buy into marketing ploys, but it's beneficial to look at the reality of the big picture. A few hundred thousand consumers boycotting or changing their ways can't make a dent when there are millions and millions of people who still provide companies with plenty of business knowingly or otherwise. If you have the ability to use a computer with internet access think about the long chain of events where if you did boycott intentionally you probably are still funding a huge mega corporations with ties to others. It's not just about fuel, but about manufacturing, utilities, transportation, maintenance and up keep where so many support business they don't even know about.

I can't really believe your lifestyle and levels of consumption are much different than my own if you have electricity, running water, mass manufactured goods or handmade goods made with mass manufactured equipment, if you buy groceries, if you travel...

The only people I would even listen to that argument from I have a low chance of ever meeting because they live in a tribal culture that hasn't been tainted by invasions, outreach efforts, or government barter programs. No matter how much we try, intentionally or not, we are at a state of human development where everyone plays a part in huge things without their knowledge. If the people had the power to over take the minority which are the wealthy business people and such don't you think we'd have incentive to utilize the power for our own benefit to put them in their place and even the playing field? Like without an accident or some horrid event to motivate us to take control of ourselves and who is truly controlling us?

If your answer is "Yes" why hasn't it worked and if your answer is "No" think about why...

As admirable as the intention of making change is, the reality of such change actually coming about and the realistic numbers and amount of deregulation required to make it at all probable I know is not going to happen in modern culture.

I hate capitalism, globalization, and regulation because it has stripped away the importance to the individual and has also made more hopeless struggles and catch 22s of the human condition that are all unnecessary and based on an "individual's" bright idea to come together and make a "productive society". Too bad so many way back when were easily conned, and now in modern times it's taught in such gentle polite terms very few realize they're doing wrong.

Funny huh?

Quote:
This is not armchair politics - this is about demanding that industries work clean (which they can, if they want/ have to)... "higher prices"... ? Maybe as much as "lower profit margins"?


If I had to count the fear factor downfalls of this approach I wouldn't come up with what half of those who put regulations into place would come up with. Regardless accidents will always happen and will never be appropriately planned for when entering into uncharted territory.

BTW I didn't make the armchair politics statement, just for the record.

Quote:
We *cough* or those holding funds *cough* need to get more aware of what we spend our bucks on - and who works with this money.


This level of awareness would probably do more to piss people off and make them feel hopeless/care less and give up more so than it would produce positive change. It's all one big vicious cycle but so is life! Need oxygen to live, but it's a corrosive so therefore we die. wink

I'm not trying to argue, but really there's a balance to everything and even with the best of intentions terrible things happen... like wars... I'm not for a moment going to give any lifeform more credit or value than my own be it a human, animal, plant, planet, or molecule of air, it shouldn't be too hard to understand why even if it's just that the thing I hate wasting most is my own effort!

------------------------------------------------------

On to new updates this disaster has caused one suicide in the gulf by a fisherman scared about his future financial impact (it's sad, but I'm not going to judge and understand why he made that choice) and on top of that hurricanes from developing storm systems have become a reality which will put a halt to containment efforts along with spread the mess.

I didn't see anyone who has updated these two things being shown on the news so I thought I'd add it.


I really love you EoN! Tell it just like it really is!

Originally Posted By: EpitomeOfNovice
Originally Posted By: FireTom
Why now - if this thesis are universally human - people volunteer to clean up. Why did people go to Haiti and tried to help there? Why do people donate money to organizations - hoping to make a positive difference


To look good, to impress others, for their reputations, to gain power, to gain admiration, to play a part in controlling others, to make others indebted to them, for opportunities based on character to be offered, to push their products and innovations, free publicity...

Do I need to continue?


I believe that individuals that volunteer are trying to make an impact for the better. I have my doubts about organisations however. Every time anything happens anywhere in the world we are bombarded with relief adverts that continue long after the worst part of the hardships have eased. I could go on but I've made my point on that subject.

Originally Posted By: WoodlandApple
just butting in to point out that as a christian, good deeds DOES NOT get you into heaven. In fact, if that is your intent then that is the way to MISS OUT in going to heaven


Also butting in: Genghis Kahn, Gandhi and Hitler would all get into heaven if they repent and accept Christ, as far as Christianity goes. I believe that good acts and a high conscionable code of ethics is the foundation for heaven in this life.

Originally Posted By: Eera
Just out of curiosity, how far down the foodchain does this "you work in Extractive Industries, you are EVIL" thing go?

The directors and senior executives are evil, OK, what about the owners of the companies, do the shareholders count (1/4 of all Australians). The people directly driving haul trucks, draglines, longwall drillers, OK, they've sold out and are happily destroying the environment for $120,000 a year, what about the employees of CAT, Detroit, Terex, Bucyrus, Euclid, Hitachi and other heavy machinery employees, what about the people in Bridgestone making the tyres?

The cleaners of MAC camps and ESS, they're solely there to service mining, and the cooks on site, the people supplying food too?

Where's the line drawn?

Personally I find it vaguely insulting. I'm in mining because I enjoy the work; I get paid the same whether I'm doing the footings for hospitals, ferry terminals or coal handling and preparation plants so really haven't "sold out" for the money. I could rant on about it, or I can do this instead; shrug my shoulders and let the person who lives in a cave, dressed in skins and hunting their own foot with a flint spear throw the first stone (or spear). ONLY if you do not consume any of the products which we produce can you condemn us for providing the raw materials in the first place.


I completely follow you on this, but I think the point is no matter who you are, or where you are, you have some piece of the negligence that allows the 'evil' to succeed. Change your lifestyle in anyway you can to lessen the links in the 'food chain of evil'.(need I make the clique?)

Originally Posted By: WoodlandApple
yes, but why is firetom hunting his own foot? Is he like a puppy?

I must be evil too because I have driven 2000kms this week.


Get a diesel car that will run on vegetable oil!

Originally Posted By: FireTom
I'm not sure though whether America is home to "a more compassionate or enlightened environment and culture" and - to me - the Stanford and 3rd wave experiments are part of its proof. For one we should not forget that most American people have been/ are siblings of Europe... and that torture of prisoners or exploitation of power is to be observed throughout the cultures.


I'm certain North America is NOT home to a more compassionate or enlightened culture. The rise of 'evil' could very easily happen in North America, just as it could anywhere. As far as the 'most American people have been/ are siblings of Europe' thing, it is just fact and time proven, what happens in NA will have huge impact on the EU and vice versa. It is impossible to untangle the 2 and the semi-homogenised cultures make the differences minimal at best. If it can happen in one it can or will happen in the other.

I'm so tired I have missed the point I wanted to make because I was too busy playing catch up and putting my 2 cents in. But now that I feel all preachy and self righteously good I can sleep better knowing I "talked" about the oil spill just after flying halfway across the continent to be at a 5 hour conference then catch a flight back home directly afterwards smile
_________________________
The popcorn extends life... The popcorn expands consciousness...

Top
#917011 - 30/06/10 08:32 PM Re: BP oil spill [Re: Fugee]
WoodlandApple Offline
addict

Registered: 01/12/09
Loc: Australia
Originally Posted By: Refuge Crew


Get a diesel car that will run on vegetable oil!



I would but I dont have the $$$$$


Quote:
Also butting in: Genghis Kahn, Gandhi and Hitler would all get into heaven if they repent and accept Christ, as far as Christianity goes. I believe that good acts and a high conscionable code of ethics is the foundation for heaven in this life.


Then I guess EoN was talking about you then...
_________________________
sticks and stones my break my bones, but ski patrol will save me.

Top
#917016 - 30/06/10 10:32 PM Re: BP oil spill [Re: WoodlandApple]
Eera Offline
old hand

Registered: 29/05/03
Loc: In a test pit, Mackay
@ Firetom: I'm not saying YOUR ethics are insulting specifically, it's the (possibly) inadvertant hypocrasy as displayed by Dentrassi's hippie (which I've had too), it's Greenpeace dangling off a coal terminal trying to disrupt loading, all the while chugging around in a steel boat fuelled by hydrocarbons, it's the ignorance of the very people who consume that feel free to lecture... (not aimed at you, it's a world-wide phenomenon)

I can honestly tell you that companies I've worked for (in Australia, it's the only country I've done this line of work) make every effort to do a clean job, it's in legislation that they have to, but the companies are going above and beyond to the extent that it's costing them money to do so. It's an issue elsewhere, I ackowledge that and would not even attempt defending some of the diamond mines I've seen in Namibia where life if cheap and engineering the stope properly is expensive.

Topsoil is removed and stockpiled for eventual remediation, it's a sackable offence to drive on a topsoil stockpile. No longer can they leave gaping great gashes in the landscape; at the end of life the site has to be remediated and returned to its original condition. Tailings dams are being dug up, processed and the tailings extracted.

It's not perfect, but it is happening. There are pretty dramatic screw ups every now and again, but a lot of time and effort is put into preventing them re-occurring.


Edited by Eera (30/06/10 10:35 PM)
_________________________
There is a slight possibility that I am not actually right all of the time.

Top
Page 5 of 8 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >



     Show more..